ACA, Federal Government, Health Insurance

After Obamacare—What’s Next for Insurance Companies?

February 23, 2017

I have described the likelihood that, in a post-ACA world, the federal government will step back and the states will have more flexibility and responsibility. The next key player in this equation is the insurance industry.

The ACA created a substantial web of requirements and prohibitions that applied to insurance companies—including rules requiring that carriers insure all applicants, that premiums could not vary based on applicants’ health status, that (in effect) younger applicants subsidize the cost of older applicants, and that limited the companies’ profits from health insurance. In effect, the ACA made insurance companies serve as instruments of the ACA’s policy objective of providing health insurance to all. The problem with this use of insurance companies was that they did not feel they were adequately compensated for serving in this capacity.

In the post-ACA world carriers will be given more latitude to identify who they are willing to cover and how they will underwrite and price those coverages. This theme is emerging in recent proposed regulations that start giving carriers more ability to restrict enrollments (by shortening the annual open enrollment period under ACA and by limiting individuals’ ability to enroll in midyear under the ACA’s special enrollment rules). https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-02-17/pdf/2017-03027.pdf

This theme also emerges in legislative proposals that are starting to emerge—proposals that will move to a common pre-ACA requirement that there be some proof of prior coverage as a part of covering preexisting conditions and easing (or eliminating) the limitations on how insures set premiums.

The key unknown is whether these changes will give the carriers enough control to continue participating in individual and small group markets. Correspondingly, as carriers exert more control over premiums and issuing coverage to those with preexisting conditions, it is not clear how many individuals will lose access to coverage.

Bottom line—as the role of the federal government recedes in a post-ACA world, insurance carriers (along with states) will have more flexibility and responsibility. The implications of this shift will take years to play out.

Staying on top of rapidly changing developments

Risk Pooling, Risk Shifting and Risky (Health Insurance) Business

Risk Pooling, Risk Shifting and Risky (Health Insurance) Business

The efforts to dismantle the Affordable Care Act, piece by piece, continue. Over the past few months the Trump Administration: •      Finalized regulations expanding Association Health Plans (“AHPs”) for unrelated employers; •      Signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, eliminating the individual mandate; •      Finalized regulations expanding short-term limited duration (“STLD”) coverage; •      Stopped payments to insurance […]

ACA, ACA Repeal, STLD
The Senate Tax Bill A Benefits Perspective

The Senate Tax Bill: A Benefits Perspective

The Senate has now passed its version of a revamp to the tax code (H.R. 1). The legislation makes significant changes to many provisions of the code, including dramatic changes to corporate and individual taxation. The bill now goes on to a conference committee to reconcile differences with the bill passed by the House of […]

ACA, Tax Reform
IRS-Prepares-to-Levy-2015-ACA-Penalties

Internal Revenue Service Prepares to Levy 2015 ACA Penalties

The Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) remains on the books, despite all of the rhetoric about potential legislative and/or administrative changes. And, in a significant new development, the IRS is poised to begin levying penalties on employers, under the ACA’s employer mandate, for 2015. This is important for a number of reasons: •      Regardless of what happens […]

ACA, Employer Mandate